Exploring the Capabilities of ChatGPT for Lexicographical Purposes: A Comparison with Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary within the Microstructural Framework
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Generative Models, ChatGPT, E-lexicography, Microstructure, Oxford Advanced Learner’s DictionaryAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seen success in many areas of science in the past few years. From computer science to linguistics, deep neural networks have the ability to perform better than the previous state-of- the art solutions. Indeed, generative text-based models like ChatGPT are able to imitate human writing, however its capabilities in lexicography have not been studied thoroughly. This paper compares the lexicographical data provided by ChatGPT and the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary in the scope of microstructure. Two main datasets are created for manual analysis and similarity score tests. The aim is to demonstrate the effectiveness of ChatGPT in providing lexicographical data to English language learners as compared to the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. We accomplish this by comparing the provided data related to lexicographical items, using Wiegand’s item classes to identify the co-occurring items within the microstructure of both platforms. The framework of item classes provides us with a list of lexicographical items that serve as our criteria. We then examine each lexical entry individually to determine whether each lexicographical item is present in both tools. The results are presented in a comparative table as percentages. Also, using Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU) and Recall Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE) methods we calculate the similarity between the lexicographical data provided by ChatGPT and the Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Since ChatGPT has been trained on human data, we investigate how similar its generated answers are to the ground truth. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of AI-generated dictionary content and its applicability in pedagogical lexicography. Additionally, it highlights the challenges and limitations that need to be addressed in order to inform the development of AI models for lexicography.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.